得|とくtoku[0]heiban (flat)
This browser can't play pronunciations (needs Safari 18.4 or later, or Chrome / Edge / Firefox).
- na-adjective, nounprofit; advantage; benefit; gainalso written as 徳
- na-adjective, noun, Buddhismrebirth in paradise, entering nirvana
Conjugation
| Plain form | 得(とく) |
|---|---|
| Polite (desu) | 得です(とくです) |
| Negative (dewa nai) | 得ではない(とくではない) |
| polite (dewa arimasen) | 得ではありません(とくではありません) |
| Past (datta) | 得だった(とくだった) |
| Past negative (dewa nakatta) | 得ではなかった(とくではなかった) |
| Te form (de) | 得で(とくで) |
| Adverbial (ni) | 得に(とくに) |
| Conditional (nara) | 得なら(とくなら) |
Common forms generated by rule; see the senses for honorific or irregular usage.
- SynonymプラスNeutralColloquial and figurative: something that benefits you or works in your favor, as in 「プラスになる」. 「得」 stresses getting a bargain or coming out ahead, as in 「得をする」.
- SynonymゲインNeutralLoanword for gains or profit, rarely heard in everyday speech; colloquially say 「得」 or 「儲け」.
- Synonym有益ゆうえきNeutralMeans beneficial or useful, often said of knowledge and activities; 「得」 stresses profit or getting a good deal.
- Synonym益えきNeutralAdverb meaning more and more; unrelated to the benefit sense of 「得」 and not interchangeable. For benefit, say 「得」 or 「利益」.
- SynonymプロフィットWrittenLoanword for profit, used mainly in business and formal contexts; in everyday speech say 「利益」 or 「儲け」.
- Related有利ゆうりNeutralDescribes conditions that favor you or give you the advantage; 「得」 stresses a good deal or a benefit, as in 「今買ったほうが得だ」.
- Related得分とくぶんWrittenWritten, old-fashioned word for gains or one's share of proceeds; rarely used in modern Japanese.
- Related割のいいわりのいいCasualColloquial: a good return for the effort or money you put in, as in 「割のいいバイト」; 「得」 is more general.
- Antonym損そんNeutralThe direct opposite of 「得」: losing out or taking a loss, as in 「損得」.
Use 「得」 for coming out ahead or getting a bargain, as in 「得をする」 and 「お得」. Say 「プラスになる」 for something that benefits you, 「有利」 for favorable conditions, 「有益」 for something useful, and 「損」 for losing out.
Usage comparisons are AI-assisted and cross-checked by multiple models; for study reference only


